These principles exist to make Labs consistent and accountable — consistent across the companies we support, and accountable to the founders who trust us to support them.
They are also the basis on which we evaluate ourselves. When a company succeeds, we ask which of these we executed well. When a company struggles, we ask which of these we let slip.
-
Principle 01
Diagnose before prescribing.
Most first-line problems are symptoms. Before we deploy resources, run introductions, or hire a consultant, we find the root cause. Solving the wrong problem fast is worse than solving the right problem slowly — it wastes the founder's time and erodes trust in the function.
-
Principle 02
Be honest, early, and specific.
If we see a gap, we name it. If we see a person in the wrong seat, we say so. If we see a plan that won't hold, we push back before the founder bets the company on it. Being polite later is more expensive than being direct now — and founders who want real partnership want real feedback.
-
Principle 03
Capacity, not just advice.
The difference between a board member and a Labs partner is that we show up with the people and the hands to actually close the gap. Coaching matters, but so does an engineer who can ship, a salesperson who can close, and a recruiter who can hire. We bring both.
-
Principle 04
Founders own outcomes. Labs owns support.
We never take the pen away from the founder. Our job is to make the founder more effective, not to run the company. When we disagree with a call, we disagree clearly — and then we support the decision the founder makes. The one exception: when our governance rights are triggered, we use them.
-
Principle 05
Intervene early, not late.
The cost of an early correction is a difficult conversation. The cost of a late correction is a failed company. We probe regularly enough, and honestly enough, that by the time a problem is obvious to the board, we have already been working on it.
-
Principle 06
Coachability is a prerequisite, not a preference.
We assess founder receptivity before we invest, not after. Founders who cannot take feedback will destroy capital at any price. Labs is not a tool for making uncoachable founders coachable — it is a multiplier for founders who already engage with hard truths about themselves and their companies.
-
Principle 07
We are partners, not vendors.
Labs' posture with portfolio companies is explicit. We are aligned on outcomes, not billing rates. Some support is delivered at no cost as a condition of investment; some is delivered at-cost through our network; none of it is a separate commercial relationship dressed up as help. The distinction matters, and we protect it.
-
Principle 08
Every case compounds.
Every diagnosis, intervention, success, and failure becomes a case study. These feed the next company's onboarding, the next founder's coaching, and the next iteration of our own playbooks. A Labs that does not learn from its own work is just consulting with extra steps.
-
Principle 09
The portfolio is one organism.
We do not treat portfolio companies as independent bets to be left alone. We actively connect them, broker the joint ventures, and make sure the strategic advantage of being in M31 is real and felt. When a portfolio company wins, the ecosystem wins with them.
-
Principle 10
Systemize, don't heroize.
If the only way something works is because a specific person did it, we haven't actually built the capability yet. We document the logic, build the playbooks, and make sure the next case can be handled by the next person — hardened into a machine that outlives any individual on the team.
-
Principle 11
Loop back into Research.
Labs sits closest to what is actually happening on the ground — which technologies are being adopted, which founders are succeeding and why, what the market is really doing. That signal belongs back in Research, updating the thesis and sharpening the next round of investment decisions. Labs without a feedback loop is a dead end.
-
Principle 12
Protect the standard.
Labs' value depends on every engagement being at a high bar. We would rather support fewer companies well than stretch the function across more companies poorly. When we cannot deliver excellence, we say so — and we fix the capacity problem before we take on the next commitment.